DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUAKD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BUG
Tarkat No- 2174-14
19 November 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tes Secretary of the Navy
i Ls occ,
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (aj) Witlée 10 U.8.€. 1552
Fncl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 3 Jan 14 w/attachments
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, to change his reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for
retention), which was issued on 19 August 2008.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey and Koman and Ms.
Countryman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 19
November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
relief should be granted. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner originally enlisted in the Marine Corps
Reserve and entered a period of active duty on 31 October 2005.
He was released from active duty on 30 March 2006 at the
completion of his Initial Active Duty for Training. On 3
December 2007, he enlisted in the Navy Reserve. oOn 7 December
2007, he was counselled regarding being in a Class III (non-
deployable) dental status and warned that unless he corrected
his dental issues, he was subject to administrative separation.
He was not the subject of any disciplinary action. He failed to
correct his dental issues. He was then recommended for
administrative separation due to unsatisfactory participation.
On 27 August 2008, he was discharged with a general
characterization of service due to unsatisfactory participation
and assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
c. On 12 December 2012, the Naval Discharge Review Board
(NDRB) upgraded Petitioner’s characterization of service to
honorable and changed his narrative reason for separation to
Secretarial Authority. The NDRB made these changes based on the
fact that he was not the subject of any disciplinary action, but
was merely in a Class III dental status.
d. Petitioner could have been assigned a waivable RE-3G
(condition, not a disability, interfering with performance of
duty) reentry code.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
particularly in light of NDRB’s changes, the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner's
reentry code. The Board believes an RE-4 reentry code is not
appropriate in this case due to his exemplary service record.
The Board believes the RE-3G reentry code would have been the
appropriate code in this case. In view of the above, the Board
directs the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that
on 27 August 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the
RE-4 now of record.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
ec. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
a
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6960 13
He was then recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner’s reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 April 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6862 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change his reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention). The Board, consisting of Ms. Henkel and Messrs. Rothlein and Zsalman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 23 July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should be granted. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4339 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change her reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention), which was issued on 19 October 2012. He was then recommended for administrative separation due to her diagnosed adjustment disorder. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 19 October 2012, she was issued an RE-3G reentry code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0017 14
The Board, consisting of Ms. Bianchi and Messrs. Dixit and Gattis, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 April 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed condition. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by changing his RE-4 reentry code, which was issued on 21 September 2007, to RE-36G, b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11884 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and particularly in light of the Army orthopedic surgeon’s diagnosis, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner's reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 January 2014, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4107-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIG Docket No: 4107-13 19 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ‘ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3780 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting: that his RE-4 {not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Mr. Rothleim, and Mr. Clemmons, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and ‘injustice on 10 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5636 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code, issued on 14 March 2014, be changed. Although his medical records were not available for review, enough evidence existed to show that he was diagnosed with a medical condition interfering EGA Docket No: 5636-14 with the performance of his duties and that he was recommended for administrative separation due to a condition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01123 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect a change in his reentry code issued on 22 May 1997, from RE-4 (not recommended for retention) to RE-3G condition (not physical disability) interfering with performance of duty in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The Board, consisting of Mr. Lacroix,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0533 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into military service (other)) and the RE-4 reentry code issued on 17 February 2009, be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Ms. Lapinski, and Mr. Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice © on 12 March 2014, and, pursuant to its...